Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Small. 2011 Jan 4;7(4):531–539. doi: 10.1002/smll.201001091

Table 1.

Pharmacokinetic parameters of hGH delivery to rats.

Group[g]
1 2 3 4 5
Administered dose (μg)[a] 169 ± 10 148 ± 5 162[h] 164 ± 14 167 ± 15
Cmax (ng/ml)[b] 60 ± 12 12 ± 5* 31 ± 15* 49 ± 12 68 ± 7
tmax (h)[c] 0.7 ± 0.3 0.7 ± 0.3 0.8 ± 0.3 0.6 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.3
t1/2 (h)[d] 1.2 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.3 1.4 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.3
AUC (h·ng/ml)[e] 174 ± 35 20 ± 13* 101 ± 49* 120 ± 28* 181 ± 26
BA (%)[f] 100 ± 20 13 ± 8* 61 ± 29* 71 ± 17* 106 ± 15
[a]

The applied dose was measured with ELISA (n=4).

[b]

Cmax is the maximum hGH concentration.

[c]

tmax is the time recorded as the peak concentration of hGH, Cmax

[d]

t1/2 is half-life of hGH concentration relative to Cmax.

[e]

Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated from Fig. 3 using the trapezoid method.

[f]

Bioavailability (BA) was calculated as (AUCgroup/Dosegroup)/(AUCgroup 1./Dosegroup 1)

[g]

The group numbers are the same as in Figure 3: (1) SC injection, (2) CMC microneedle patch, (3) SC injection of reconstituted CMC patch (after 15 months storage), (4) CMC/trehalose microneedle patch, (5) SC injection of reconstituted CMC/trehalose patch.

[h]

The Group 3 dose is the original amount of hGH encapsulated in the microneedles on dry basis, not the amount of active hGH after storage.

[*]

Significantly different from Group 1 (Student's t-test, p < 0.05)