Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 25;9(8):e105878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105878

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of 21 cases of the control and microcalcification groups.

Case age Pathologic diagnosis Assum-ed calcific-ation on PAI* Confirmed calcification on specimen mammography
Existence Number Size*
1 25 Fibroadenoma No No - -
2 43 Ductal carcinoma in situ Yes Yes 10 500 (210–830)
3 25 Fibroadenoma No No - -
4 24 Fibroadenoma No No - -
5 39 Fibroadenoma No No - -
6 31 Fibrocystic change Yes Yes 45 310 (190–940)
7 41 Fibroadenoma No No - -
8 43 Fibrocystic change Yes Yes 17 130 (90–220)
9 49 Ductal carcinoma in situ Yes Yes 16 160 (70–260)
10 41 Fibroadenoma Yes No - -
11 42 Fibrocystic change Yes Yes 41 325 (160–390)
12 47 Ductal carcinoma in situ Yes Yes 27 220 (110–250)
13 24 Fibroadenoma No No - -
14 48 Ductal carcinoma in situ Yes Yes 14 280 (140–430)
15 24 Fibroadenoma Yes No - -
16 29 Fibroadenoma No No - -
17 41 Fibroadenoma No No - -
18 46 Columnar cell change Yes Yes 1 230
19 59 Sclerosing adenosis Yes Yes 22 220 (80–760)
20 39 Fibrocystic change No Yes 29 265 (120–390)
21 74 Ductal carcinoma in situ Yes Yes 17 290 (110–1000)

*Median value (range) of the diameter in calcifications (µm).

Abbreviations: PAI, photoacoustic Imaging.