Table 2. Results of the statistical analyses comparing human and robotic demonstrators' movement velocities.

Mixed-design ANOVA on demonstrators' V	Newman-Keuls post hoc
	R-I < H-I for S, M and F, p<0.001
Velocity*Object-Directedness*Group	R-T < H-T for S, M and F, p<0.01
F2,50 = 4.4, p<0.05	H-T < H-I for S, M and F, p<0.001
	R-T and R-I for S, M and F, Not significant
Group*Trajectory*Velocity	R-SC < H-SC for S, M and F, p<0.001
F2,50 = 53.61, p<0.01	R-JS < H-JS for S, M and F, p<0.001

The results of the mixed-design ANOVA on human (H) and robotic (R) demonstrators' mean movement velocities. On the left the interactions among the within-subject factors Velocity, Trajectory and Object-Directedness and the between-subject factor Group. On the right the result of the Newman-Keuls post-hoc comparisons focused on the differences between human and robotic movements performing transitive (T) and intransitive (I) motions, while covering smooth-curvilinear (SC) and jerky-segmented (JS) trajectories at different velocities (Slow, Medium and Fast).