Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Med. 2013 May 2;15(11):882–887. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.58

Table 2. Characteristics and return-of-results practices of index studies.

Number (Percent)
Nature of data acquisition
 Primary data/specimen collection 126 (63%)
 Secondary data/specimen analysis 74 (37%)

Primary Collection Secondary Use

Mode of acquisition of data or specimens* NA
 From those responsible for primary data collection 57 (77%)
 From a public repository 5 (7%)
 Other 12 (16%)
Signed data use agreement NA
 Yes 49 (67%)
 No 14 (19%)
 Unsure 10 (14%)
If present, data use agreement forbade participant re-identification NA
 Yes 29 (60%)
 No 9 (19%)
 Unsure 10 (21%)
Method to link data/specimens to individual identifiers§
 Directly labeled with identifiers 3 (2%) 0 (0%)
 Linked to identifiers with code 109 (87%) 30 (67%)
 No link to identifiers 9 (7%) 12 (27%)
 Other 3 (2%) 3 (7%)
 Unsure 2 (2%) 0 (0%)
Study has previously returned individual genetic test results to participant(s)**
 Yes 7 (6%) 0 (0%)
 No 107 (91%) 32 (97%)
 Unsure 3 (3%) 1 (3%)
Study has plans to return individual genetic test results to participant(s) ††,‡‡
 Yes 2 (2%) 0 (0%)
 No 103 (94%) 33 (100%)
 Unsure 5 (5%) 0 (0%)

NA, Not applicable

*

Secondary analysis, n=74

Secondary analysis, n=73

Secondary analysis, n=48

§

Primary analysis, n=126; secondary analysis, n=45

**

Primary analysis, n=117, secondary analysis, n=33

††

Primary analysis, n=110, secondary analysis, n=33

‡‡

Among studies that had not previously returned results to individual participants