Table 2.
Distribution of Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Ap), Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. (Bb), Ehrlichia canis (Ec) and Dirofilaria immitis (Di) positive samples per province (percentage and total numbers)
| Province (number of veterinary clinics) | Percentage Ap positive (x/y) | Percentage Bb positive (x/y) | Percentage Ec positive (x/y) | Percentage Di positive (x/y) | Percentage Ap + Bb positive (x/y) | Percentage Ap + Bb + Ec positive (x/y) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater Poland (5) | 12.72 % (43/338) | 2.66 % (9/338) | 0.30 % (1/338) | 0.30 % (1/338) | 0.89 % (3/338) | |
| Kuyavia-Pomerania (1) | 10.26 % (8/78) | 6.41 % (5/78) | 1.28%c (1/78) | |||
| Lesser Poland (4) | 25.24 % (53/210) | 3.81 % (8/210) | 2.86 % (6/210) | |||
| Łódź (4) | 20.28 % (43/212) | 11.32 % (24/212) | 8.49 % (18/212) | |||
| Lower Silesia (3) | 13.39 % (15/112) | 5.36 % (6/112) | 1.79 % (2/112) | |||
| Lublin (5) | 7.50 % (24/320) | 2.19 % (7/320) | 0.94 % (3/320) | 0.94 % (3/320) | ||
| Lubusz (3) | 16.49 % (32/194) | 4.64 % (9/194) | 0.52 % (1/194) | 1.55 % (3/194) | 0.52 % (1/194) | |
| Masovia (2) | 3.21 % (5/156) | 0.64 % (1/156) | 0.64 % (1/156) | 0.64 % (1/156)/ 0.0 % (0/156)a | ||
| Opole (1) | 15.00 % (18/120) | 6.67 % (8/120) | 0.83 % (1/120) | 1.67 % (2/120) | ||
| Podlaskie (2) | 9.68 % (12/124) | 1.61 % (2/124) | 0.81 % (1/124) | |||
| Pomerania (6) | 8.23 % (20/243) | 1.65 % (4/243) | 0.41 % (1/243) | 0.41 % (1/243) | 0.82 % (2/243) | |
| Silesia (3) | 20.90 % (42/201) | 5.97 % (12/201) | 3.48 % (7/201) | |||
| Subcarpathia (2) | 4.27 % (5/117) | 2.56 % (3/117) | ||||
| Świętokrzyskie (2) | 4.80 % (6/125) | 1.60 % (2/125) | 0.80 % (1/125) | |||
| Warmia-Masuria (5) | 8.73 % (20/229) | 2.62 % (6/229) | 0.44 % (1/229) | 0.87 % (2/229) | ||
| West Pomerania (6) | 11.11 % (35/315) | 3.17 % (10/315) | 0.95 % (3/315) | |||
| Total (54) | 12.31 % (381/3,094) | 3.75 % (116/3,094) | 0.26 % (8/3,094) | 0.16 % (5/3,094)/0.13 % (4/3,094)a | 1.71 % (53/3,094) | 0.03 % (1/3,094) |
x samples positive for a specific pathogen, y total number of samples tested per province
aCorrected data after discounting one potential A. vasorum cross-reacting dog in Masovia Province