Table 3.
Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average | Maximum | Minimum | Average | Maximum | Minimum | |
Specificity | 85.3 | 85.7 | 84.8 | 85.6 | 86.2 | 85.2 |
Sensitivity | 54.3 | 55.4 | 53.6 | 54.6 | 55.4 | 54.1 |
Overall correct classification | 73.9 | 74.2 | 73.5 | 74.8 | 74.9 | 74.5 |
NOTE. Model 1 examined the prediction of falls from the TUG test, adjusting for all study covariates, whereas model 2 examined whether the effect of the TUG test was invariant across H&Y levels (ie, an H&Y × TUG interaction was also included). The overall correct classification represents the percentage of the sample whose fall status was correctly classified.
Abbreviations: Sensitivity, percentage of fallers who were correctly identified; specificity, percentage of nonfallers who were correctly identified.