. 2014 Jul 10;86(15):7688–7695. doi: 10.1021/ac501722r

Table 2. Results Obtained from the Custom Grid–Monte Carlo Analysis Using Velocity Data for M₄Ag₄₄(p-MBA)₃₀ Compared to the Zeno Prediction Based on the X-ray Crystallographic Structure Published in Ref (31)^a.

analysis	ν̅ (mL/g)	φ	M (fixed)	s_20,w (×10⁻¹³ s)	D_20,w (×10⁻⁶ cm²/s)	R_h (Å)
Custom Grid	0.27 (0.21, 0.32)	1.46 (1.23, 1.70)	9621.8 g/mol	4.19 (3.91, 4.46)	1.45 (1.31, 1.59)	14.0 (12.7, 15.5)
Zeno	0.239	1.245		5.33	1.85	12.1

Values in parentheses reflect the 95% confidence intervals from the Monte Carlo analysis. The values predicted by Zeno do not consider bound waters, which explains the discrepancies in ν̅, φ, and R_h.

Table 2. Results Obtained from the Custom Grid–Monte Carlo Analysis Using Velocity Data for M4Ag44(p-MBA)30 Compared to the Zeno Prediction Based on the X-ray Crystallographic Structure Published in Ref (31)a.

Table 2. Results Obtained from the Custom Grid–Monte Carlo Analysis Using Velocity Data for M₄Ag₄₄(p-MBA)₃₀ Compared to the Zeno Prediction Based on the X-ray Crystallographic Structure Published in Ref (31)^a.