Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Oper Dent. 2014 May 8;39(5):473–480. doi: 10.2341/13-141-C

Table 3.

Factors affecting dentists’ decision to surgically intervene into inner enamel lesions according to patients’ age

Variable Adult patient scenario Pediatric patient scenario

OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value
Lower Upper Lower Upper
Type of practice
        Employed by another dentist 1 1
        Self-employed without partners and without sharing of income, costs, or office space 0.26 0.11 0.62 0.002 0.38 0.15 0.93 0.034
Percentage of patients who self-pay* 1.04 1.01 1.07 0.021 1.03 1.00 1.07 0.057
Practice busyness, n (%)
        Too busy to treat all people requesting appointments 1 1
        Provided care to all, but the practice was overburdened 1.37 0.39 4.78 0.620 2.22 0.47 10.44 0.310
        Provided care to all, and the practice was not overburdened 3.72 1.05 13.19 0.042 4.35 0.90 20.94 0.067
        Not busy enough 1.58 0.38 6.49 0.528 1.92 0.35 10.59 0.452
Using a dental explorer for a primary occlusal caries diagnosis* (reference: no use) 1.64 0.57 4.69 0.360 8.32 1.84 37.71 0.006

CI, confidence interval

C statistic (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve) is 0.73 in the adult patient model, and 0.70 in the pediatric patient model.

Statistically significant odds ratios are highlighted in bold italic font.

*Adjusted for gender, years elapsed since graduation from dental school, waiting time for restorative dentistry, city population, patient age distribution, and percentage of patient contact time spent each day doing restorative, aesthetic and extractions procedures, conducting caries risk assessment, and percentage of patients who receive diet counseling in both adult- and pediatric-patient models

*

Continuous variable