Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 5;99(5):F391–F394. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-305968

Table 1.

Guidelines and practice concerning deferred Cord Clamping and cord milking for very preterm birth in 7 practising sites in the UK 2012

Site Guideline content pertaining to DCC in very preterm birth Guideline content pertaining to CM in very preterm birth Reported practice of DCC Reported practice of CM Recommended duration DCC Duration reported in practice Specific instructions about execution of CM in guideline (number of milkings, length of cord, height of baby etc Delivery into plastic bag prior to cord ligation mandated in guideline Guideline exclusions Comments
Site 1
Tertiary Hospital
Presented as alternative options Very few All None 5–10 s No No Most babies <28 weeks delivered by caesarean section had CM—more variability at higher gestations
Site 2
tertiary hospital
6000–7000 deliveries
Discouraged Recommended Few ‘standard practice’ NA ? Yes Yes CM seen as safer than DCC in all circumstances
Site 3
medium size district hospital
5000–6000 deliveries
Recommended Only if DCC seen as unsafe 70% in recent audit Minority 30 s 30s No No None DCC considered as part of resuscitation process
Site 4
tertiary hospital
6000–7000 deliveries
Nil Nil Minority Minority No recommendation ? No No DCC recommended for term births
Site 5
tertiary hospital
Recommended Nil Majority <28 weeks Few, if any 45 s 30 s No No Need for immediate resuscitation.
Absent cord pulsation, or cord incised.
Placental separation.
Concerns for health of mother
Site 6
smaller district hospital
2000–3000 births
Discouraged Nil Minority Minority Discouraged 0–30 s No No ‘The consensus paediatric view, therefore, is that DCC should not be practised routinely on preterm babies.,
Policy advised CM where DCC could not be achieved.
Site 7
4000–5000 births
tertiary hospital
Nil Nil Minority Minority NA 15–60 s No No None

CM, cord milking/stripping; DCC, deferred cord clamping.