Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 6;4(4):411–424. doi: 10.1007/s13205-013-0169-6

Table 2.

Results of statistical (CCD) analysis for medium optimization

Model term Coefficient estimate Computed t value p value Confidence level (%)
prob > F
(a) Model coefficient estimated by regressions
 Intercept 0.443596 56.21 0* 100
 CMC (X1) 0.087215 16.657 0* 100
 Yeast extract (X2) −0.028983 −5.535 0* 100
 Peptone (X3) −0.008664 −1.655 0.129 87.1
 CMC × CMC Inline graphic −0.045706 −8.967 0* 100
 Yeast extract × yeast extract Inline graphic 0.008741 1.715 0.117 88.3
 Peptone × peptone Inline graphic −0.011942 −2.343 0.041* 95.9
 CMC × yeast extract (X1 × X2) 0.0175 2.558 0.028* 97.2
 CMC × peptone (X1 × X3) 0.02175 3.179 0.01* 99
 Yeast extract × peptone (X2 × X3) 0.02975 4.349 0.001* 99.9
Source DF SS MS F value p value
prob > F
(b) ANOVA for quadratic model
 Regression 9 0.163 0.0182 48.51 0
 Linear 3 0.116 0.0388 103.61 0
 Square 3 0.0338 0.0113 30.05 0
 Interaction 3 0.0133 0.00444 11.85 0.001
 Residual (error) 10 0.00374 0.000374
 Lack of fit 5 0.00281 0.000561 2.99 0.127
 Pure error 5 0.000938 0.000188
 Total 19 0.167

DF degrees of freedom, SS sum of squares, MS mean square

* Significant p values, p ≤ 0.05; R2 = 0.9776; predicted R2 = 0.8642; adjusted R2 = 0.9575