Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 28;20(32):11384–11393. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11384

Table 6.

Subgroup analyses comparing disease-free survival probabilities of the 160 mg/d group to their respective controls in the phase II and follow-up studies

Subgroup analyses Phase II study 3-yr study
Week 48
Week 156
Group A untreated Group B 160 mg/d Group A untreated Group B 160 mg/d
Study cohort
DFS probability 54.1% 68.4% 38.5% 49.4%
Difference 14.3% 10.8%
95%CI -3.4-32.0 -7.3-29.0
Rate of improvement1 26.4% 28.1%
P value2 0.129 0.257
Intermediate-risk group (multiple or single tumor ≥ 2 cm)
DFS probability 45.1% 63.8% 33.0% 48.4%
Difference 18.7% 15.4%
95%CI -0.8-38.2 -3.9-34.7
Rate of improvement 41.5% 46.6%
P value 0.104 0.150
High-risk group (multiple or single tumor ≥ 2 cm and positive HBV/HCV infection)3
DFS probability 41.4% 64.9% 29.6% 46.4%
Difference 23.5% 16.8%
95%CI 2.0-45.0 -4.4-38.1
Rate of improvement 56.8% 56.8%
P value 0.045 0.163

1,2 Table 3 footnote 2 and 3;

3

Values from Figure 3. The clinical benefits of 160 mg/d PI-88 were more pronounced in intermediate and high-risk groups. Statistically significant survival benefits were observed in the high-risk group at the end of the phase II study. TTR: Time-to-recurrence; DFS: Disease-free survival; OS: Overall survival; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; HCV: Hepatitis C virus.