Figure 6.

Spike size and kinetics comparison: CFEs recordings vs. 9-Ch NCD-UMEA

A, representative amperometric spikes detected by one channel of the 9-Ch NCD-UMEA (left) and by a CFE (right) using bovine chromaffin cells. Notice the ‘foot’ anticipating the fast rising phase of the two amperometric spikes. B, cubic root charge histogram distribution fitted by a double Gaussian function derived from the 9-Ch NCD-UMEA (left) and CFE (right) spike recordings (see text for details of the fitting). C, half-time width histogram derived from the 9-Ch NCD-UMEA (left) and CFE (right) spike recordings.