Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 12;2014:541950. doi: 10.1155/2014/541950

Table 3.

Pooled RR of acotiamide versus placebo for nonresponders by Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model.

Groups or subgroups Number of trials [reference] Number of patients RR; 95% CI P value Test of heterogeneity
P value I 2
Overall symptoms 2 [16] 768 0.95; 0.73–1.24 0.710 0.510 0%
 50 mg, tid 1 [16] 227 1.46; 0.78–2.73 0.230 NA NA
 100 mg, tid 2 [16] 431 0.83; 0.55–1.26 0.380 0.420 0%
 300 mg, tid 2 [16] 441 0.90; 0.60–1.34 0.590 0.590 0%
PDS 2 [16] 396 0.71; 0.50–1.02 0.060 0.300 18%
 50 mg, tid 1 [16] 151 1.22; 0.64–2.34 0.540 NA NA
 100 mg, tid 2 [16] 206 0.51; 0.26–0.99 0.050 0.370 0%
 300 mg, tid 2 [16] 218 0.61; 0.34–1.10 0.100 0.560 0%
EPSa 2 [16] 320 1.76; 0.90–3.45 0.100 0.190 35%
 50 mg, tid 1 [16] 73 3.89; 0.46–33.17 0.210 NA NA
 100 mg, tid 2 [16] 184 1.91; 0.48–7.57 0.360 0.170 47%
 300 mg, tid 2 [16] 192 2.31; 0.34–15.74 0.390 0.070 70%

aMantel-Haenszel random-effects model.

CI, confidential interval; FD, functional dyspepsia; NA, not applicable; RR, risk ratio; and tid, three times daily.