Skip to main content
editorial
. 2007 May 7;13(17):2397–2403. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i17.2397

Table 1.

Controlled trials of CBT in adults with irritable bowel syndrome

Authors Design Sample size Outcome
Corney et al[62] (1991) CBT vs SMT. FU at 4 & 9 mo 42 CBT = SMT
Greene et al[64] (1994) CBT vs SMT. FU at 3 mo 20 CBT > SMT
Payne et al[65] (1995) CBT vs Self-help support group vs SMT. FU at 3 mo 34 CBT > Self-help > SMT
Drossman et al[68] (2003) CBT vs education, and desipramine vs placebo (parallel studies). No FU 431 CBT > education; desipramine: placebo
Boyce et al[61] (2003) CBT vs relaxation training vs SMT. FU at 12 mo 105 CBT = Relaxation training = SMT
Blanchard et al[66] (2007) Group CBT vs Self-help support group vs SMT. FU at 3 mo 210 CBT = Support group > SMT
Kennedy et al[63] (2006) Multicenter primary care intervention by nurses. Open label. CBT + mebeverine vs mebeverine alone. 149 CBT + mebeverine > Mebeverine alone at 3 & 6 mo FU

SMT: standard medical care with symptom self-monitoring; FU = follow up; Mebeverine: anticholinergic for inhibition of smooth muscle contractions.