Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 17;21(5):808–814. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002381

Table 5.

Comparison of four state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms on Chinese admission and discharge summaries when optimized features were used

Algorithm Admission notes Discharge summaries
Exact-match Inexact-match Exact-match Inexact-match
SVM 90.54 (90.81/90.27) 93.70 (93.99/93.42) 85.56 (85.89/85.21) 89.87 (90.23/89.52)
ME 90.43 (91.07/89.80) 93.49 (94.15/92.84) 85.15 (86.01/84.30) 89.70 (90.61/88.80)
CRF 93.52 (93.77/93.26) 94.69 (94.95/94.43) 89.23 (90.29/88.20) 91.00 (92.08/89.94)
SSVM 93.53 (92.93/94.15) 95.35 (94.72/95.97) 90.01 (89.19/90.84) 92.65 (91.91/93.51)

Values are F-measure (recall/precision) (%).

CRF, conditional random fields; ME, maximum entropy; SVM, support vector machines; SSVM, structural support vector machines.