Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Rev Vaccines. 2014 Jul 7;13(8):1027–1038. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2014.935767

Table 2.

Clinical trials comparing immunogenicity of two versus three doses of HPV vaccines in females.

Trial Number Study Location Vaccine Age Formulation Dose Timeline Results
NCT00541970 Canada and Germany bHPV 9-14, 15-19, and 20-25 years licensed vs increased antigen content (0, 6 months) or (0, 2 months) vs (0, 2, 6 months) Two-dose schedule in girls 9-14 years was non-inferior to three-dose schedule in women 15-25 years
NCT01717118 Mexico bHPV 9-10 years and 18-24 years licensed (0, 6, 60 months) vs (0, 1, 6 months) Two-dose schedule in girls 9-10 years was non-inferior to three-dose schedule in women 18-24 years
NCT01381575 Germany, Canada, Italy, Taiwan, and Thailand bHPV 9-14 years vs 15-25 years licensed (0, 6 months or 0, 12 months) vs (0, 1, 6 months) ongoing
NCT00501137 Canada qHPV 9-13 years and 16-26 years licensed (0, 6 months) vs (0, 2, 6 months) At 36 months, antibody responses to all four HPV types were non-inferior for both two- and three-dose regimens among 9-13-year-old girls compared to three-dose regimen in women ages 16-26.
NCT00923702 India qHPV 10-18 years licensed (0, 6 months) vs (0, 2, 6 months) Study stopped

*Note: bHPV=bivalent HPV vaccine (HPV genotypes 16/18). qHPV= quadrivalent HPV vaccine (HPV genotypes 6/11/16/18).