Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 22;30(17):i527–i533. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu477

Table 1.

Comparison of average running times in seconds for RidgeRace and the APE implementations of GLS and REML, shown for trees of different size, ranging from 100 to 500 leaf nodes

Method 100 200 300 400 500
RidgeRace 4 + 0 29 + 1 135 + 1 1074 + 7 3372 + 24
GLS 1 2 3 7 10
REML 2 6 15 38 123

Note: RidgeRace running time is provided as the running time required for full λ inference plus time required for ACR.