Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 28;9(8):e105728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105728

Table 3. Subgroup analysis based on different FIB-4 index cutoff values.

Thresholds Number ofstudies Summary estimates(95% CI) Likelihood ratio (95%CI) AUHSROC(95% CI)
Sensitivity Specificity DOR PLR NLR
Significant fibrosis
0.8–1.085 5 0.73 (0.68–0.77) 0.62 (0.56–0.67) 4 (3–6) 1.9 (1.6–2.2) 0.44 (0.36–0.54) 0.73 (0.69–0.77)
1.45–1.62 6 0.65 (0.56–0.73) 0.77 (0.7–0.83) 6.24 (4.06–9.61) 2.83 (2.16–3.71) 0.45 (0.36–0.57) 0.78 (0.74–0.81)
3.25 3 0.18 (0.13–0.24) 0.98 (0.95–0.99) 7.53 (3.06–18.54) 6.04 (2.61–13.96) 0.85 (0.76–0.95) 0.61 (0.57–0.65)
Severe fibrosis
1.45–1.65 4 0.68 (0.6–0.75) 0.75 (0.69–0.81) 6.44 (4.44–9.35) 2.75 (2.21–3.43) 0.42 (0.34–0.53) 0.77 (0.73–0.80)
Cirrhosis
1.6–2.29 7 0.82 (0.75–0.88) 0.77 (0.71–0.82) 15.55 (8.69–27.80) 3.59 (2.73–4.74) 0.23 (0.16–0.33) 0.87 (0.84–0.90)
2.9–3.6 3 0.42 (0.36–0.48) 0.96 (0.95–0.97) 46.28 (18.3–117.04) 13.38 (9.24–19.37) 0.3 (0.06–0.45) 0.96 (0.92–1.00)

95% CI: 95% confidence interval. DOR: diagnostic odds ratio. PLR: positive likelihood ratio; NLR: negative likelihood ratio. AUHSROC: area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve.