Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2004 May 21;339(1):117–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.038

Table 2.

Quantitative analysis of the sheet-tracing results at 8 Å

PDB codes No. total Cα No. sheet Cα found by STRIDE No. true sheet Cα found by sheettracer No. true sheet Cα missed by sheettracer No. false sheet Cα found by sheettracer Specificity (%) Sensitivity (%) rms deviations (Å)
5cpa 308 53 34 19 6 97.6 64.1 1.59
121p 167 47 33 14 4 98.3 76.6 1.65
1ag9 176 33 24 9 6 95.8 72.7 2.37
4rhv 209 85 80 5 10 91.9 94.1 1.55
1fy9 214 54 36 18 3 98.1 66.7 1.56
1duz 276 119 77 42 12 92.4 64.7 1.86
6adh 749 174 129 45 43 92.5 74.1 1.84
1h1l 998 140 100 40 21 97.6 71.4 1.83
1tsp 391 189 127 62 24 88.1 67.2 1.61
1ads 316 39 23 16 8 97.1 59.0 1.80
1aqb 176 82 63 19 6 93.6 76.8 1.73
1b9x 341 180 122 58 28 82.6 67.8 1.84
Average 93.8 71.3 1.77

The sheet-tracing results were based on 8 Å simulated density maps using the combination of sheettracer and the deconvolution method. The detailed calculation of sensitivity and specificity and the explanation of rms deviations can be found in the footnote to Table 1.