Table 1.
Nanocomposite type | Method of synthesis | Size (nm) | Concentration (μg/ml) | Assay (Test) | Cell type | Refrence | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Mg–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation/ion exchange | 50-100 | 40 | MTT | Human kidney (N) | [4] | Contain folic acid and not toxic, more than 80% of cell viable after 3days. |
2. Zn–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation | _ | 150 | MTT | Mouse fibroblast (C) | [7] | Higher fibroblast viability with LDH-levodopa treatment than pure levodopa, LDH alone no significant effect on fibroblast |
3. ZLH | Direct method | _ | 20 | MTT | Human liver cell (HepG2) (C) | [8] | Hippuric acid (HA) intercalated ZLH showed better synergy than pure HA and tamoxefen on cancer cells. |
4. Mg–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation | 150-200 | 100 | MTT | Colon cell(C) | [10] | LDH coated with chitosan also not toxic at this dose on this cells |
5. Mg–Al–LDH | Ion exchange | >300 | Animal single dose | Whole animal | [13] | Contain captopril and not toxic to the animal exposed. | |
6. Mg–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation | 80-90 | 20 | MTT | Human cervical cancer (C) | [16] | Potentiate the effect of paclitaxel |
7. Mg–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation | 129-149 | 100 | MTT/Trypan blue | Cortical neuron(N) | [17] | DNA loaded LDH less toxic than pristine LDH at higher dose |
8. Mg–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation | _ | 1000 | MTT | Human osteosarcoma (C) | [18] | 5-fluorouraci loaded LDH show better effect than free drugs |
9. Mg–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation | 50,100,200,350 | MTT | Fibroblast(N) and lung(c) | [20] | Potentiate the effect of anti-cancer and milder on normal cells | |
10. Mg–Al–LDH/Zn-Al-LDH | Co-precipitation | _ | 80mg/kg of ketoprofen | Magnifying lens | Mucosal surface | [21] | Ketoprofen induced gastritis was reduced with LDH intercalation |
11. Mg–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation | _ | 5-2000mg/kg | Blood chemistry | Balb/c mice | [26] | No significant changes to clinical and biochemical parameters and no evidence of particle retention in tissues. |
12. Zn-Al-LDH | Co-precipitation/ion exchange | _ | 1.2 | MTT | Chang liver cells (N) | [29] | Lower concentration used and no effect on viability from either the carrier or loaded LDH |
13. ZLH | Direct method | _ | 1000 | Trypan blue | Chang liver cells (N) | [30] | No Significant cell viability decrease below 125μg/ml with good anti histamine release from the intercalated cetirizine. |
14. Zn-Al-LDH | Direct method | 150 | 800 | MTT, GSH, ROS, NO, comet assay, | Cervical cell (Hela) (C) | [32] | Only dose above 400ug/ml causes DNA damages, hence biocompatibility possible since it has no toxic effect at lower doses base these assays. |
15. Zn–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation/ion exchange | _ | 50 | MTT | Mouse fibroblast and human lung fibroblast cells | [33] | The toxic effect of Para-amino salicylic acid on the two cells was decrease after intercalation into this LDH |
16. Mg–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation | 50-300 | 2000 | Trypan blue dye exclusion | Human Embryonic Kidney cell (HEK 293T) (N) | [34] | More than 50% of cells viable at 500μg/ml. DNA transfection successful but lower than using commercial means. |
17. Mg–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation/ion exchange | 57-63 | 40 | MTT | Human gastric epithelial cell (GES-1) gastric cancer cell (MKN45 and SGC-7901) | [36] | Etoposide harmful effect on normal cell significantly reduced and its anticancer effect enhanced after intercalation into LDH. |
18. Mg–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation | _ | 50 | MTT | Breast (MCF-7) (C),cervical (HeLa) (C), and fibroblast (3T3) (N) | [37] | Not toxic to all the three cell line, but enhanced the anti-cancer effect of protocatechuic acid. |
19. Mg–Al–LDH | Co-precipitation | 20 | 50 | MTT | lung fibroblast cell (N) | [38] | No toxic effect against the tested cells and bacteria. Activity of the intercalated antibiotics similar to the naked one |
The table summarises some of the layered hydroxide nanocomposite activity in relation to toxicity and distribution over the last few years. The majority of whom were synthesis by either co-precipitation or ion exchange method, with sizes between 50-300 nm in most of them. Cell proliferation assay using MTT is applied in large no of the studies to evaluate for their cytotoxic and or anti-cancer impact on some selected cell lines.