Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 17.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2014 Jun 8;511(7509):307–311. doi: 10.1038/nature13301

Extended Data Table 2. MQM model of only main effects of 14 candidate morphological QTL on niche score.

The table summarises a main effects-only MQM model enforced to contain all the selected candidate morphological QTL for niche score (run in R/qtl: niche score as response variable, Haley-Knott regression, with F2 family covariate). Model terms (at left) are named according to LG locations of the candidate QTL, which were limited to the one best candidate per LG prior to modelling (see Methods). For each QTL (model term), the table also gives: map position in centimorgans (cM); nearest SNP marker; percentage of total variance explained (PVE) for niche score; F-test statistic; corresponding degrees of freedom (d.f.); and P-value. Significant model terms indicated as follows: * 0.01 ≤ P < 0.05; † 0.001 ≤ P < 0.01; and ‡ P < 0.001. Overall model results (abbreviations: SS, sum of squares; LOD, logarithm10 of odds score): SSmodel = 169.34; d.f.model = 56; SSerror = 464.09; d.f.error = 473; LODmodel = 35.80; PVEmodel = 26.73%; P-value (F) = 2.91×10-11.

Model term Map location (cM) Nearest SNP PVE F d.f. P-value (F)
LG1 36.00 chrI:25560380 0.52 % 1.688 2 0.185991
LG2† 12.00 chrII:10092618 1.69 % 5.470 2 0.004480†
LG4‡ 28.76 ChrIV:10997988 2.34 % 7.542 2 0.000596‡
LG7‡ 26.99 chrVII:19857837 3.28 % 10.58 2 3.21×10.05
LG8‡ 18.00 chrVIII:16299555 3.74 % 12.08 2 7.63×10.06
LG9 28.38 chrIX:6126845 0.84 % 2.719 2 0.066968
LG10 4.00 chrX:1275840 0.66 % 2.121 2 0.121029
LG12 38.00 chrXII:15046849 0.57 % 1.846 2 0.159010
LG13* 20.00 chrXIII:17392141 1.16% 3.733 2 0.024619*
LG14 39.55 chrXIV:4632223 0.24 % 0.776 2 0.460631
LG16† 13.52 chrXVI:9981125 2.16% 6.989 2 0.001020†
LG17 12.00 chrXVII:2232080 0.03 % 0.109 2 0.896894
LG20* 14.62 ChrXX:9279241 1.43 % 4.630 2 0.010198*
LG21 18.00 chrXXI:11060209 0.33 % 1.080 2 0.340247