Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2014 Sep 15;98(5):520–528. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000094

Table 4.

Coordination of Care

Percentage p-value
Reporting structure for clinical issues: p<0.001
 Transplant medicine/nephrology reports to transplant surgery 36.5
 Transplant surgery reports to transplant medicine/nephrology 12.2
 Other 48.7
Financial structure of transplant center: p<0.001
 All resources go into the group practice under the same budget 25.0
 Transplant surgery reports to transplant medicine/nephrology 51.9
 Other 21.2
Recipient evaluations done by: p<0.001
 Medical transplant team 11.5
 Surgical transplant team 15.4
 Both medical and surgical transplant teams 73.1
 Other 0.0
Donor evaluations done by: p<0.001
 Medical transplant team 23.1
 Surgical transplant team 6.4
 Both medical and surgical transplant teams 67.3
 Other 3.2
Admitting service for transplant surgery: p<0.001
 Transplant surgery 67.9
 Transplant nephrology 9.6
 Urology 2.6
 Joint transplant surgery/nephrology 18.6
 General surgery 0.0
 Other 1.3
Admitting service ≤3 months post-transplant: p<0.001
 Transplant surgery 45.5
 Transplant nephrology 34.0
 Urology 2.6
 Joint transplant surgery/nephrology 14.7
 General surgery 0.0
 Other 3.2
Admitting service >3 months post-transplant: p<0.001
 Transplant surgery 18.6
 Transplant nephrology 57.7
 Urology 2.6
 Joint transplant surgery/nephrology 15.4
 General surgery 0.0
 Other 5.8
Out-patient team ≤3 months post-transplant: p<0.001
 Transplant surgery 23.1
 Transplant nephrology 40.4
 Urology 9.6
 Joint transplant surgery/nephrology 26.9
 General surgery 0.0
 Other 0.0
Out-patient team >3 months post-transplant: p<0.001
 Transplant surgery 6.4
 Transplant nephrology 63.5
 Urology 6.4
 Joint transplant surgery/nephrology 22.4
 General surgery 0.0
 Other 1.3
Medical and surgical regular joint walking rounds: p=0.23
 Always 25.0
 Frequently 19.9
 Occasionally 31.4
 Never 23.7
Overall working relationship between medical and surgical teams: p<0.001
 Excellent 60.9
 Very good 23.1
 Good 13.5
 Fair 1.9
 Poor 0.6