Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar 5;211(3):253.e1–253.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.033

Table 3.

Test characteristics for predicting SGA10

Cut-off point* Relative Risk (95%CI) Sensitivity (95%CI) Specificity (95%CI) PPV (95%CI) NPV (95%CI)
PV, cc ≤51.0 2.6 (1.6–4.3) 42.9% (30.0–56.7) 80.1% (76.3–83.4) 18.8% (12.6–26.8) 92.9% (90.0–95.0)
PQ ≤0.59 2.6 (1.6–4.2) 41.1% (28.4–55.0) 80.8% (77.1–84.1) 18.7% (12.5–26.9) 92.7% (89.9–94.9)
MPD, cm ≤10.0 1.8 (1.0–3.0) 30.4% (19.2–44.3) 81.2% (77.6–84.4) 14.8% (9.1–22.9) 91.6% (88.6–93.9)
PMI ≥17.4 3.3 (2.0–5.3) 50.0% (36.5–63.5) 79.5% (75.7–82.8) 20.7% (14.4–28.7) 93.7% (90.9–95.7)
MCD, cm ≤7.5 2.5 (1.6–4.2) 42.9% (30.0–56.7) 79.3% (75.5–82.7) 18.2% (12.2–26.0) 92.8% (89.9–95.0)
Mean PI ≥1.88 1.9 (1.2–3.2) 35.7% (23.7–49.7) 80.0% (76.3–83.3) 16.3% (10.4–24.2) 92.0% (89.0–94.2)

SGA10- birthweight <10th%ile; PPV- positive predictive value, NPV-negative predictive value; PV- placental volume; PQ- placental quotient; MPD- mean placental diameter; PMI- placental morphology index (MPD/PQ); MCD- mean chorionic diameter; PI- pulsatility index (uterine artery Doppler)

*

Cut-off point refers to the value of the ultrasound parameter below or above which the screening test was deemed positive.