Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar 5;211(3):253.e1–253.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.033

Table 5.

Test characteristics for predicting SGA5

Cut-off point* Relative Risk (95%CI) Sensitivity (95%CI) Specificity (95%CI) PPV (95%CI) NPV (95%CI)
PV, cc ≤51.0 3.0 (1.5–6.2) 46.4% (28.0–65.8) 79.1% (75.4–82.4) 10.1% (5.7–17.1) 96.7% (94.4–98.1)
PQ ≤0.59 3.2 (1.6–6.6) 46.4% (28.0–65.8) 80.0% (76.4–83.2) 10.6% (6.0–17.7) 96.7% (94.5–98.1)
MPD, cm ≤10.0 2.6 (1.3–5.4) 39.3% (22.1–59.3) 81.1% (77.5–84.2) 9.6% (5.1–16.8) 96.3% (94.1–97.8)
PMI ≥17.7 3.7 (1.8–7.6) 50.0% (31.1–68.9) 80.2% (76.6–83.4) 11.4% (6.6–18.7) 96.9% (94.8–98.2)
MCD, cm ≤7.40 3.3 (1.6–6.8) 46.4% (28.0–65.8) 80.5% (76.5–83.7) 10.8% (6.1–18.1) 96.7% (94.5–98.0)
Mean PI ≥1.9 1.6 (0.7–3.5) 28.6% (14.0–48.9) 80.0% (76.4–83.2) 6.8% (3.2–13.3) 95.7% (93.3–97.3)

SGA5- birthweight <5th%ile; PPV- positive predictive value, NPV-negative predictive value; PV- placental volume; PQ- placental quotient; MPD- mean placental diameter; PMI- placental morphology index (MPD/PQ); MCD- mean chorionic diameter; PI- pulsatility index (uterine artery Doppler)

*

Cut-off point refers to the value of the for the ultrasound parameter below or above which the screening test deemed positive or negative.