Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 5;24(5):417–426. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20140024

Table 3. Analysis of potentially associated factors with ‘annoying tinnitus’ in participants over 40 years old (n = 1112).

Variables %a Annoying
tinnitus
Univariable analysis Multivariable analysisc


P-value OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI
Demographic characteristics
Age, years (mean)b   60.10 <0.0001 1.04 1.02–1.05 0.0007 1.03 1.01–1.04
Sex
 Male (%) 491 (48.09) 34.44 Referent      
 Female (%) 621 (51.91) 35.12 0.83 1.03 0.78–1.36      
Marital status
 No (%) 13 (1.30) 45.46 0.50 1.57 0.43–5.77      
 Yes (%) 1099 (98.70) 34.65 Referent      
Income
 Lower (%) 263 (24.93) 36.42 Referent      
 Lower middle (%) 301 (28.33) 35.37 1.00 0.96 0.61–1.50      
 Upper middle (%) 273 (25.29) 35.41 1.00 0.96 0.58–1.57      
 Upper (%) 275 (21.45) 31.42 0.81 0.80 0.49–1.30      
Otolaryngologic conditions (Physical examination and questionnaire)
Falling attack
 No (%) 1074 (96.34) 34.67 Referent      
 Yes (%) 38 (3.66) 38.02 0.72 1.16 0.52–2.56      
History of dizziness
 No (%) 764 (69.56) 33.48 Referent      
 Yes (%) 348 (30.44) 37.80 0.29 1.21 0.85–1.71      
Vertigo, subjective positional
 No (%) 1066 (96.60) 34.27 Referent      
 Yes (%) 46 (3.40) 49.52 0.11 1.88 0.87–4.06      
Vestibular dysfunction
 No (%) 1064 (95.99) 34.08 Referent Referent
 Yes (%) 48 (4.01) 51.84 0.02 2.08 1.10–3.93 0.56 1.27 0.57–2.83
Cholesteatoma
 No (%) 1080 (97.31) 34.87 Referent      
 Yes (%) 32 (2.69) 32.14 0.79 0.89 0.36–2.19      
Hearing loss
 No (%) 768 (73.19) 30.25 Referent Referent
 Yes (%) 344 (26.80) 47.18 <0.001 2.06 1.52–2.80 0.01 1.55 1.09–2.21
Otitis media with effusion
 No (%) 1100 (99.21) 34.65 Referent      
 Yes (%) 12 (0.79) 53.26 0.29 2.15 0.52–8.86      
Rhinitis
 No (%) 836 (73.85) 34.52 Referent      
 Yes (%) 276 (26.15) 35.56 0.80 1.05 0.73–1.51      
Rhinosinusitis
 No (%) 1037 (92.86) 34.36 Referent      
 Yes (%) 75 (7.14) 40.45 0.38 1.30 0.73–2.31      
TM perforation
 No (%) 1056 (94.50) 34.07 Referent      
 Yes (%) 56 (5.50) 47.19 0.08 1.73 0.94–3.17      
Data obtained from the questionnaire
Alcohol drinking
 No (%) 390 (30.62) 38.53 Referent      
 Yes (%) 722 (69.38) 33.15 0.11 0.79 0.59–1.05      
Depressive mood
 No (%) 1034 (93.67) 34.34 Referent      
 Yes (%) 78 (6.33) 41.52 0.25 1.36 0.80–2.29      
History of anxiety            
 No (%) 1091 (98.42) 34.9 Referent      
 Yes (%) 21 (1.58) 30.91 0.75 0.84 0.28–2.49      
History of cardiac disease
 No (%) 1103 (99.48) 34.54 Referent Referent
 Yes (%) 9 (0.52) 83.08 0.008 9.28 1.79–48.13 0.04 5.51 1.04–29.20
History of stroke
 No (%) 1079 (97.56) 34.51 Referent      
 Yes (%) 33 (2.44) 46.04 0.28 1.62 0.68–3.88      
Smoking, current
 No (%) 919 (77.59) 35.19 Referent      
 Yes (%) 193 (22.41) 33.43 0.69 0.93 0.63–1.36      
Smoking, past
 No (%) 661 (55.46) 34.28 Referent      
 Yes (%) 451 (44.54) 35.44 0.74 1.05 0.78–1.43      
Stress
 No (%) 772 (69.54) 31.95 Referent Referent
 Yes (%) 340 (30.46) 41.29 0.02 1.50 1.07–2.09 <0.01 1.64 1.14–2.36
Visual disturbance
 No (%) 1100 (99.21) 34.71 Referent      
 Yes (%) 12 (0.79) 44.76 0.51 1.52 0.43–5.40      
Quality of life score (mean)b   68.16 0.06 0.99 0.98–1.00      
Laboratory data
Anemia
 No (%) 997 (90.73) 34.85 Referent      
 Yes (%) 115 (9.27) 34.20 0.90 0.97 0.62–1.53      
Diabetes
 No (%) 954 (86.10) 33.43 Referent Referent
 Yes (%) 158 (13.90) 43.22 0.03 1.52 1.03–2.24 0.26 1.25 0.85–1.84
Hepatitis B
 No (%) 1077 (96.91) 35.01 Referent      
 Yes (%) 35 (3.09) 27.91 0.44 0.72 0.31–1.65      
Hypercholesterolemia
 No (%) 924 (82.65) 33.58 Referent      
 Yes (%) 188 (17.35) 40.57 0.16 1.35 0.89–2.05      
Hypertension
 No (%) 660 (62.02) 32.58 Referent      
 Yes (%) 452 (37.98) 38.41 0.07 1.29 0.98–1.70      
Obesity
 No (%) 719 (64.68) 37.11 Referent Referent
 Yes (%) 393 (35.32) 30.56 0.05 0.75 0.56–1.00 0.06 0.75 0.56–1.01

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; TM, tympanic membrane.

aPercent of Korean population aged ≥40 years.

bContinuous variables were denoted by mean. In the non-annoying tinnitus group, the mean age was 55.70, and the mean of quality of life score was 71.06.

cVariables with P-value ≤0.05 in univariable analysis were selected.

Univariable and multivariable analyses were done using the logistic regression model.