Table 1. Five decades of cervical cancer screening: observed and projected (in a scenario without screening) number of incident cases and ASRs of cervical cancer, age 30–74.
Cumulative number of incident cases, 1961–2010 |
ASR (per 100 000) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observed |
Projecteda,b |
Prevented by screening |
Observed |
Projecteda |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
Average per year, 2006–2010 |
1961–1965 |
1986–1990 |
2006–2010 |
2006–2010 |
|
Country | Screening activitiesc | N | N | 95% CI | N | %d | N | ||||
Denmark |
1967, regional; 1996, national |
25 704 |
53 210 |
48 038–58 806 |
27 506 |
51.7 |
1239 |
70.9 |
32.4 |
19.2 |
102.0 |
Finland |
1963, national; 1971, completed |
9410 |
15 133 |
12 814–18 136 |
5723 |
37.8 |
202 |
33.0 |
7.1 |
7.5 |
21.8 |
Norway |
1970 s, opportunistic; 1995, national |
15 146 |
24 603 |
21 555–28 393 |
9457 |
38.4 |
552 |
35.2 |
25.3 |
19.0 |
62.8 |
Sweden |
1967–1973, national |
24 556 |
42 777 |
38 018–48 312 |
18 221 |
42.6 |
647 |
39.7 |
16.2 |
13.6 |
40.0 |
Total | - | 74 816 | 135 723 | 127 463–145 715 | 60 907 | 44.9 | 2640 | - | - | - | - |
Abbreviations: ASR=age-standardised incidence rate (world standard population); CI= confidence interval.
Assuming that the absence of screening activities would imply constant period effects.
Model-based confidence intervals for projections were obtained by simulation.
Year of onset and type of screening activity.
Percentage computed=(prevented cases × 100)/projected cases.