Skip to main content
letter
. 2014 Jul 3;111(5):965–969. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.362

Table 1. Five decades of cervical cancer screening: observed and projected (in a scenario without screening) number of incident cases and ASRs of cervical cancer, age 30–74.

    Cumulative number of incident cases, 1961–2010
ASR (per 100000)
    Observed
Projecteda,b
Prevented by screening
Observed
Projecteda
 
 
 
 
 
Cumulative
Average per year, 2006–2010
1961–1965
1986–1990
2006–2010
2006–2010
Country Screening activitiesc N N 95% CI N %d N        
Denmark
1967, regional; 1996, national
25 704
53 210
48 038–58 806
27506
51.7
1239
70.9
32.4
19.2
102.0
Finland
1963, national; 1971, completed
9410
15 133
12 814–18 136
5723
37.8
202
33.0
7.1
7.5
21.8
Norway
1970 s, opportunistic; 1995, national
15 146
24 603
21 555–28 393
9457
38.4
552
35.2
25.3
19.0
62.8
Sweden
1967–1973, national
24 556
42 777
38 018–48 312
18221
42.6
647
39.7
16.2
13.6
40.0
Total - 74 816 135 723 127 463–145 715 60 907 44.9 2640 - - - -

Abbreviations: ASR=age-standardised incidence rate (world standard population); CI= confidence interval.

a

Assuming that the absence of screening activities would imply constant period effects.

b

Model-based confidence intervals for projections were obtained by simulation.

c

Year of onset and type of screening activity.

d

Percentage computed=(prevented cases × 100)/projected cases.