Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug;103(2):124–130. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140113

Table 1.

Echocardiographic characteristics of the animals

  Females Males
Sham Moderate MI Large MI Sham Moderate MI Large MI
N 7 9 12 8 8 12
BW (g) 232 ± 23* 227 ± 8# 262 ± 22$ 343 ± 56 322 ± 12 300 ± 24
IM size (%) --- 32 ± 7 47 ± 6 --- 33 ± 9 46 ± 6
LVDA (mm2) 2.5 ± 0.4 4.6 ± 0.8 5.4 ± 1$ 3.2 ± 0.3 5.3 ± 0.6 8.2 ± 0.7$
LVSA (mm2) 0.8 ± 0.1 3 ± 0.8 3.9 ± 0.9$ 1.2 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.8 5.7 ± 1.1$
LVDA/BW (mm2/g) 0.011 ± 0.002 0.020 ± 0.003 0.020 ± 0.004 0.010 ± 0.001 0.016 ± 0.002 0.027 ± 0.002$
LVSA/BW (mm2/g) 0.003 ± 0.0006 0.013 ± 0.003 0.015 ± 0.004 0.003 ± 0.0006 0.010 ± 0.002 0.019 ± 0.004$
FAC (%) 67 ± 2 34 ± 10 26 ± 16 63 ± 4 36 ± 11 29 ± 14

BW: body weight; LVDA: left ventricular diastolic area; LVSA: left ventricular systolic area; FAC: fractional area change; MI: myocardial infarction

*

p < 0.05 compared with sham males;

#

p < 0.05 compared with moderate MI males

p < 0.05 compared with large MI males;

p < 0.05 compared with the respective sham;

$

p < 0.05 compared with respective moderate MI size.