Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Fluency Disord. 2014 Jul 6;0:12–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2014.06.002

Table 3.

Inferential analyses pertaining to the four a priori hypotheses.

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia
Skin Conductance Level
Effect F P (sig.) Effect Size F P (sig.) Effect Size
Hypothesis 1: Baseline Conditions
Group*Condition 0.366 0.545 0.055 3.003 0.084 0.143
Group 4.445 0.040 0.620 0.312 0.580 0.194
Hypothesis 2: Listening-viewing
Group*Condition 0.438 0.508 0.073 5.033 0.025 0.190
Group 1.530 0.221 0.316 0.757 0.391 0.304
Hypothesis 3: Speaking
Group*Condition 2.160 0.118 0.213 13.055 <0.001 0.300
Group 4.657 0.033 0.373 4.678 0.042 0.946
Hypothesis 4: Task (listening-viewing vs. speaking)
Group*C ondition 4.621 0.032 0.150 21.285 <0.001 0.267
Group 3.207 0.074 0.170 4.776 0.030 0.292

Notes. All significant results are bolded. Only results pertaining to the four a priori hypotheses are reported.