Table 3.
Cost-effectiveness results in men and women (base case and scenario analysis)
| Control | Intervention | ∆ QALY | ∆ Cost (€) | ICER (€/QALY) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QALYs | Cost (€) | QALYs | Cost (€) | ||||
| Men | |||||||
| Base case | 11.59 | 8,352 | 11.60 | 8,579 | 0.01 | 228 | 27,096 |
| Scenario 1 | 11.59 | 8,352 | 11.61 | 8,494 | 0.01 | 142 | 10,241 |
| Scenario 2 | 11.59 | 8,352 | 11.60 | 8,938 | 0.01 | 586 | 69,754 |
| Scenario 3 | 11.59 | 8,352 | 11.66 | 8,579 | 0.07 | 228 | 3,357 |
| Scenario 4 | 4.05 | 980 | 4.05 | 1,095 | 0.00 | 115 | 190,647 |
| Women | |||||||
| Base case | 12.04 | 7,688 | 12.05 | 7,951 | 0.01 | 263 | 40,139 |
| Scenario 1 | 12.04 | 7,688 | 12.05 | 7,881 | 0.01 | 193 | 17,857 |
| Scenario 2 | 12.04 | 7,688 | 12.05 | 8,320 | 0.01 | 632 | 96,567 |
| Scenario 3 | 12.04 | 7,688 | 12.11 | 7,951 | 0.07 | 263 | 3,766 |
| Scenario 4 | 4.08 | 807 | 4.08 | 926 | 0.00 | 119 | 266,700 |
Scenario 1, full compliance with the programme; scenario 2, offering the programme twice a year.
Scenario 3, increase in quality of life as a result of the BMI-decrease in the intervention group.
Scenario 4: time horizon of 5 years.
ICER, Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio; QALY, Quality Adjusted Life Year.