Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Pharm Sci. 2013 May 6;102(9):3451–3457. doi: 10.1002/jps.23581

Table 1.

Effects of OAT3 genotype on cefotaxime pharmacokinetic parameters in healthy volunteers after a single intravenous bolus dose (2 grams over 5 min).

Pharmacokinetic
Parameters
Total sample Genotype Unpaired t-test
305Ile/305Ile (n=10) 305Ile/305Phe (n=5) p-values
C0 (µg/mL) 278 ± 215 190 ± 68.4 453 ± 305 0.018#
t1/2 (h) 1.00 ± 0.200 1.10 ± 0.200 1.00 ± 0.200 0.338
AUC0–6 hrs (µg*h/mL) 149 ± 50.3 129 ± 31.4 188 ± 61.6 0.027#
Vss (mL) 13400 ± 5620 15300 ± 4990 9450 ± 5100 0.053
Total CL (mL/min) 247 ± 74.9 273 ± 68.9 193 ± 60.0 0.046
CLR (mL/min) 134 ± 53.0 158 ± 44.1 84.8 ± 32.1 0.006#
CLCR (mL/min) 96.3 ± 17.5 102 ± 17.9 85.8 ± 11.8 0.101
CLsec (mL/min) 75.8 ± 49.0 97.0 ± 42.2 33.3 ± 31.8 0.011#

The cefotaxime pharmacokinetic parameters (mean ± SD) were determined using noncompartmental analysis (WinNonLin 4.1, Pharsight Corporation). The pharmacokinetics parameters are consistent with previously reported values.20,22

C0, is the plasma concentration at first collection time point at 15 min; t1/2, elimination half-life; AUC0–6 h, area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from the initial time to the last time point at 6 h. The plasma concentrations of cefotaxime are negligible (<% of the initial concentrations) after 6 h.

CLCR, measured creatinine clearance; Vss, apparent volume of distribution at steady state. The renal clearance of cefotaxime (CLR) is the sum of the net secretory clearance (CLsec) and filtration clearance of cefotaxime. Filtration clearance of cefotaxime is creatinine clearance (CLCR) fraction of the cefotaxime unbound to plasma proteins (fu), that is, CLR = CLsec + (fuCLCR). We used 0.6 as the cefotaxime fraction unbound (fu) based on published results.20,32 In one individual who is heterozygous for variant allele, the estimated GFR was used as CLCR instead of using the measured CLCR above. This individual had an abnormal measured CLCR (2.6-fold higher than estimated GFR), whereas other individual had similar values for estimated GFR and measured CLCR.

p value is significant (p < 0.05) when the individual who is heterozygous for variant allele, with an abnormal measured CLCR was removed from the analysis. Overall, the C0, CLR, CLsec, and AUC remained significant when the analysis was performed in 14 healthy volunteers, excluding the individual with the extremely high creatinine clearance.