. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 2.

Published in final edited form as: Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Sep 24;124(3):452–461. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.09.003

Table 4.

Comparison of the performance of the algorithm to Reader 1 and Reader 2 when distinguishing between smooth delta waves and delta brushes. The algorithm did not perform as well as the readers, with smooth delta wave and delta brush true positive rates lower than both readers.

(a) Reader 1 as gold standard
	SDW True Pos.	DB True Pos.
Algorithm	375/432 (87%)	35/66 (53%)
Reader 2	386/432 (89%)	44/66 (67%)

(b) Reader 2 as gold standard
	SDW True Pos.	DB True Pos.
Algorithm	358/408 (88%)	42/90 (47%)
Reader 1	386/408 (95%)	44/90 (49%)