Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Neurol. 2013 Jul;70(7):867–874. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.1959

Table 3.

Descriptive Information for LLFS Family Members and Controls

Proband Generation Offspring
Controls (n = 138) Probands Only (n = 348) Proband Siblings (n =603) Controls (n = 222) Sons and Daughters (n =218) Nieces and Nephews (n =341)
Age 83.84*** (5.96) 93.58 (3.62) 87.78 (5.87) 70.51* (4.47) 69.61 (3.90) 70.92 (4.65)
Education 10.40 (3.46) 10.48 (3.92) 10.01 (3.63) 11.33** (3.73) 12.35 (3.14) 11.13 (3.88)
Female 108*** (78%) 144 (41%) 328 (54%) 77*** (35%) 143 (66%) 191 (56%)
Global Cognition 27.29** (2.44) 26.05 (3.13) 25.56 (3.11) 28.48* (1.95) 28.89 (1.30) 28.57 (1.60)
Immediate Memory 8.06** (4.22) 9.54 (4.34) 8.50 (4.41) 11.92** (4.32) 13.02 (4.00) 12.16 (3.92)
Delayed Memory 5.74 (4.15) 7.50** (4.43) 6.36 (4.55) 10.30 ** (4.80) 11.48 (4.23) 10.54 (4.46)
Digit Span Forward 7.77 (2.16) 7.72 (2.15) 7.64 (2.13) 7.91*** (2.13) 8.74 (2.33) 8.07 (2.12)
Digit Span Backward 5.51 (2.07) 5.54 (2.04) 5.48 (2.02) 6.07*** (1.92) 6.93 (2.43) 6.14 (2.18)
Animal Fluency 15.81** (5.31) 14.31 (5.11) 14.83 (4.84) 20.86 (5.96) 20.48 (5.86) 20.94 (5.38)
Vegetable Fluency 12.14*** (4.42) 9.92 (3.69) 10.72 (4.07) 13.61*** (4.20) 15.06 (4.45) 13.93 (4.16)
Digit Symbol 34.70*** (12.28) 27.27 (11.75) 29.94 (12.06) 41.18*** (11.78) 46.99 (11.73) 42.18 (11.36)

Note. Group differences were examined across probands versus controls, and sons/daughters versus controls.

*

p< .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.