Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2014 May 13;99:477–486. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.008

Table 1.

Subject demographics, including sample size n for seniors and subjects with each FTD phenotype, presented as mean ± standard deviation. The last column is the p-value from a one-way ANOVA with the null hypothesis that there is no difference in age, years of education or right-handedness between the four groups. For disease duration and the cognitive scores, the ANOVA is performed within the 3 FTD groups only. The p-value is greater than 0.05 for MMSE and category fluency, but not letter fluency. A post-hoc test (Tukey Honest Significant Difference) on letter fluency suggests a significant difference between bvFTD and naPPA (p < 0.02) but not between other FTD groups (p < 0.35).

Seniors bvFTD naPPA svPPA Total ANOVA (p)
n 15 33 9 12 69 NA
Sex (F, M) 9,6 12,21 3,6 8,4 32,37 0.17
Age(yr) 62 ± 6 62 ± 7 68 ± 11 63 ± 8 63 ± 8 0.16
Education (yr) 16 ± 3 16 ± 3 14 ± 3 16 ± 3 16 ± 3 0.50
Disease duration NA 5 ± 3 3 ± 2 3 ± 2 4 ± 3 0.15
MMSE 29 ± 1 24 ± 6 20 ± 8 24 ± 5 25 ± 6 0.26
Category fluency 20 ± 6 11 ± 5 8 ± 5 8 ± 5 12 ± 7 0.07
Letter fluency 49 ± 11 26 ± 15 12 ± 9 20 ± 10 28 ± 17 0.01