Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 17;2014:826405. doi: 10.1155/2014/826405

Table 3.

Table results in mean PSNR for different impulse noise reduction methods. The mean is obtained for different noise ratios in 10 test images. Total column reflects the total mean for all ratios and images.

Method Noise percentage
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Total
ACWM [19] 31.24 27.49 22.82 18.48 14.89 12.10 9.78 7.94 6.47 16.80
AMF [12] 32.17 30.45 28.77 27.18 25.59 23.97 21.87 18.03 12.03 24.45
DBAIN [20] 36.58 32.97 30.51 28.50 26.61 24.80 22.90 20.85 18.05 26.86
DSFIRE [21] 34.14 30.13 25.69 21.10 17.14 13.93 11.30 9.23 7.60 18.92
FIDRM [22] 36.28 32.53 30.12 28.29 26.76 25.39 23.89 22.08 19.68 27.23
MMEM [14] 27.77 30.46 29.52 28.71 27.84 26.88 25.76 24.45 22.59 27.11
NAFSM [23] 34.26 31.31 29.54 28.17 27.05 26.03 25.01 23.81 21.22 27.38
PSMF [17] 26.35 25.84 25.08 23.97 21.95 18.91 14.98 9.67 7.61 19.37
SDROM [5] 30.92 28.93 27.07 25.19 22.97 20.53 17.62 14.34 10.79 22.04
MDBUTMF [24] 37.22 33.86 31.62 29.82 27.94 25.53 22.45 18.83 15.05 26.92
SVM-M1 (32-40) 35.49 31.96 29.32 26.53 24.69 22.33 19.76 13.07 5.96 23.23
SVM-M1 (64-40) 35.57 32.15 29.49 26.87 25.10 22.80 20.12 13.28 5.97 23.48
SVM-M2 (32-40) 36.02 32.96 30.86 29.19 27.74 26.42 25.14 23.80 22.09 28.25
SVM-M2 (64-40) 35.96 32.90 30.81 29.14 27.69 26.37 25.11 23.77 22.06 28.20
SVM-R (32-40) 35.63 32.71 30.76 29.14 27.70 26.25 24.71 22.71 19.63 27.69
SVM-R (64-40) 35.47 32.59 30.68 29.10 27.67 26.23 24.70 22.71 19.63 27.64