Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul-Aug;49(4):552–560. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.58

Table 1.

Comparison of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Injury Surveillance System Data-Collection Processes

Characteristic
Paper Based (1982–1983 Through 2004–2005)
Web Based
2004–2005 Through 2008–2009
2009–2010 Through 2013–2014
Recording method Paper forms Electronic medical record software provided by the NCAA for participating ATs Electronic medical record software currently being used by ATs or Injury Surveillance Tool provided by the Datalys Center
Non–time-loss injuries included? No Some years Yes
Method of entering time-loss data Manually by participating AT Manually by participating AT Depends on electronic medical record software being used by AT
Method of entering exposure data Manually on weekly exposure sheet Manually per practice or competition; did not account for inactive players Manually per practice or competition; whether inactive players were accounted for depends on electronic medical record software being used by AT
Double entry required? Yes No No
Method of data transfer Mail or fax Electronically Electronically
Data protection? None Data stripped of all personally identifiable information before inclusion in datasets Data pass through sonic wall hardware and software firewalls and are stripped of all personally identifiable information before inclusion in datasets
Verification of data quality Manually by data quality-control staff Manually by data quality-control staff Automated verification engine that flags invalid data for data quality-control staff

Abbreviation: AT, athletic trainer.