Table 4. Changes in plant height, tiller number, spike length, awn length and internode characteristics of nodes 1 to 5 in the domestication from diploid to tetraploid, tetraploid to hexaploid and diploid to hexaploid of wheats.
Stem characteristics | Internode type | Diploid old wheat | Tetraploid old wheat | Hexaploid modern wheat | Diploid to tetraploid | Tetraploid to hexaploid | Diploid to hexaploid |
Plant height (cm) | 105.1±4.5 | 120.4±7.9 | 127.3±6.5 | + | 0 | + | |
Tiller number | 8.6±1.0 | 4.8±0.4 | 1.9±0.2 | − | − | − | |
Internode length (cm) | 1st | 5.1±0.4 | 5.2±0.4 | 8.5±0.8 | 0 | + | + |
2nd | 11.4±1.8 | 11.5±1.6 | 15.0±2.0 | 0 | + | + | |
3rd | 15.1±1.3 | 16.1±1.7 | 21.5±4.1 | 0 | + | + | |
4th | 22.5±2.5 | 22.5±2.6 | 28.2±3.1 | 0 | + | + | |
5th | 39.8±6.1 | 49.5±4.2 | 42.1±3.7 | + | − | 0 | |
Internode diameter (mm) | 1st | 1.6±0.2 | 2.6±0.3 | 2.7±0.2 | + | 0 | + |
2nd | 2.0±0.2 | 3.0±0.2 | 3.2±0.3 | + | 0 | + | |
3rd | 2.2±0.1 | 3.3±0.3 | 3.4±0.5 | + | 0 | + | |
4th | 2.1±0.3 | 3.5±0.3 | 3.6±0.3 | + | 0 | + | |
5th | 1.7±0.3 | 2.7±0.2 | 2.7±0.1 | + | 0 | + | |
Internode weight-diameter ratio (g/mm) | 1st | 0.03±0 | 0.05±0.002 | 0.06±0.001 | + | + | + |
2nd | 0.05±0.002 | 0.08±0.003 | 0.09±0.005 | + | + | + | |
3rd | 0.04±0.003 | 0.08±0.003 | 0.10±0.003 | + | + | + | |
4th | 0.06±0.002 | 0.1±0.01 | 0.10±0.006 | + | 0 | + | |
5th | 0.07±0.003 | 0.13±0.003 | 0.12±0.01 | + | 0 | + | |
Internode specific gravity (g*mm−10) | 1st | 4.8±0.5 | 4.1±0.6 | 4.2±0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2nd | 2.2±0.1 | 2.3±0.2 | 2.0±0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
3rd | 1.3±0.2 | 1.5±0.4 | 1.4±0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
4th | 1.2±0.2 | 1.4±0.2 | 1.2±0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
5th | 1.2±0.1 | 1.1±0.1 | 1.0±0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Spike (cm) | Length | 4.5±0.2 | 7.2±0.3 | 9.0±0.7 | + | + | + |
Awn length | 7.0±0.7 | 9.5±2.1 | 6.7±0.9 | + | − | 0 |
+ represents a significant increase at P<0.01. − represents a significant decrease at P<0.01. 0 represents no change. Results of tiller number were similar between 2009 and 2010, and average data are presented in the table.
Note: The table involved large data, here we showed the final results for clarity and conciseness.