Table 3.
Differences in the way concepts in experimental design were taught and assessed in the courses surveyed with the BEDCIa
| Experimental design-related concept assessed by BEDCI | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biological | Extraneous | Independent | Random | Purpose of | ||||
| Class | Controls | Hypotheses | variation | Accuracy | factors | sampling | sampling | experiments |
| First-year general | ∼ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ∼ |
| First-year coordinated | ∼ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ | ∼ | ✘ | ✘ | ∼ |
| First-year science | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ | ∼ | ✔ |
| Third-year laboratory | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ∼ | ✔ |
a✔ = taught explicitly (students gain practical experience in labs/tutorials/field trips and are assessed on their understanding in at least one aspect (homework, oral presentation, lab report, midterm, final, etc.). ∼ = taught implicitly (students are assessed on their understanding in a nonspecific way; they learn about the concept in lectures/tutorials and must allude to it when answering assessed questions). ✘ = absent (students are not exposed practically, and it is rare for these concepts to be taught implicitly).