Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 9;3:419. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-419

Table 4.

Adjusted mean FEV 1 AUC 0–3 , peak FEV 1 , and trough FEV 1 responses (L) compared to placebo after 6 weeks

Treatment Adjusted amean (95% CI) difference from placebo at 6 weeks
FEV 1 AUC 0–3 n Adjusted mean (SE) Mean (SE) Pvalue 95% CI
Study 1222.24
  Placebo 93 −0.030 (0.020)
  Olodaterol 5 μg QD 92 0.134 (0.021) 0.164 (0.019) < .0001 0.126, 0.201
  Olodaterol 10 μg QD 91 0.135 (0.021) 0.164 (0.019) < .0001 0.127, 0.202
  Formoterol 12 μg BID 90 0.168 (0.021) 0.198 (0.019) < .0001 0.160, 0.236
Study 1222.25
  Placebo 91 0.004 (0.024)
  Olodaterol 5 μg QD 92 0.190 (0.025) 0.186 (0.019) < .0001 0.149, 0.223
  Olodaterol 10 μg QD 90 0.202 (0.025) 0.198 (0.019) < .0001 0.162, 0.235
  Formoterol 12 μg BID 90 0.217 (0.025) 0.213 (0.019) < .0001 0.176, 0.250
Peak FEV 1
Study 1222.24
  Placebo 93 0.034 (0.022)
  Olodaterol 5 μg QD 92 0.208 (0.022) 0.174 (0.020) < .0001 0.135, 0.214
  Olodaterol 10 μg QD 91 0.200 (0.022) 0.166 (0.020) < .0001 0.127, 0.206
  Formoterol 12 μg BID 90 0.251 (0.022) 0.218 (0.020) < .0001 0.178, 0.257
Study 1222.25
  Placebo 91 0.076 (0.026)
  Olodaterol 5 μg QD 92 0.268 (0.026) 0.192 (0.019) < .0001 0.154, 0.230
  Olodaterol 10 μg QD 90 0.273 (0.026) 0.197 (0.020) < .0001 0.158, 0.235
  Formoterol 12 μg BID 90 0.293 (0.026) 0.217 (0.020) < .0001 0.178, 0.255
Trough FEV 1
Study 1222.24
  Placebo 93 −0.093 (0.023)
  Olodaterol 5 μg QD 92 0.012 (0.024) 0.106 (0.021) < .0001 0.064, 0.147
  Olodaterol 10 μg QD 91 0.020 (0.024) 0.113 (0.021) < .0001 0.072, 0.155
  Formoterol 12 μg BID 90 0.040 (0.024) 0.133 (0.021) < .0001 0.092, 0.175
Study 1222.25
  Placebo 91 0.012 (0.030)
  Olodaterol 5 μg QD 92 0.109 (0.030) 0.097 (0.026) .0003 0.045, 0.148
  Olodaterol 10 μg QD 90 0.115 (0.030) 0.103 (0.026) .0001 0.051, 0.155
  Formoterol 12 μg BID 90 0.093 (0.030) 0.080 (0.026) .0026 0.028, 0.132

AUC0–3 = area under the curve from 0 to 3 h; BID = twice daily; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 sec; QD = once daily; SE = standard error.

aBased on a mixed effects repeated measures model. The model includes treatment and period as fixed effects and center and patient within center as random effects, along with compound symmetry as a covariance structure for within−patient variation.