Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 20;51(9):1762–1772. doi: 10.1007/s13197-012-0693-0

Table 3.

Effect of wash treatments on total soluble sugars of date fruits

Wash treatmenta Contact time (min)
5 15 30 60
T1 68.4 ± 0.35aB 69.2 ± 1.25aD 68.4 ± 0.89aBC 69.2 ± 3.25aD
T2 67.3 ± 1.84aB 66.1 ± 0.78aD 67.4 ± 2.19aBC 67.5 ± 1.34aD
T3 67.0 ± 1.63aB 68.4 ± 4.31aD 67.7 ± 3.75aBC 68.4 ± 2.33aC
T4 65.9 ± 2.33aB 66.8 ± 2.03aCD 65.2 ± 4.45aB 64.6 ± 1.06aC
T5 66.5 ± 2.40bB 65.6 ± 0.0bC 60.4 ± 0.0aA 61.7 ± 0.14aB
T6 65.0 ± 0.0bAB 64.2 ± 0.0bBC 62.6 ± 7.35aAB 62.2 ± 1.00aBC
T7 65.6 ± 1.70bB 63.2 ± 0.57bAB 62.8 ± 0.0bA 62.3 ± 0.0aBC
T8 62.5 ± 0.0aA 62.3 ± 4.74aAB 62.6 ± 3.61aA 58.4 ± 1.41aA
T9 65.3 ± 0.41bB 65.4 ± 0.26bC 61.9 ± 0.92bA 56.4 ± 0.0aA
T10 61.5 ± 0.78aA 60.9 ± 0.0bA 60.2 ± 4.38bA 55.2 ± 3.54aA

asee Table 1

All the given values are means of three determinations ± standard deviation

Data are expressed as g/100 g of fresh weight

Means having different letter in a row (or column) are significantly different (P < 0.05)