Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 20;51(9):1762–1772. doi: 10.1007/s13197-012-0693-0

Table 5.

Effect of wash treatments on antioxidant capacity of date fruits

Wash treatmenta Contact time (min)
5 15 30 60
T1 239 ± 3.7aA 239 ± 6.7aA 239 ± 6.7aAB 239 ± 9.6aD
T2 270 ± 3.5cD 258 ± 9.8bC 251 ± 4.9bCD 225 ± 14.9aBC
T3 300 ± 0.0dE 285 ± 10.9cC 235 ± 3.4bA 211 ± 6.2aA
T4 319 ± 0.0cF 256 ± 10.3bB 248 ± 10.3bBC 207 ± 6.4aA
T5 277 ± 6.2cD 258 ± 10.6bB 234 ± 0.0aA 232 ± 7.0aCD
T6 247 ± 4.1bBC 240 ± 13.2abA 235 ± 6.4aA 234 ± 1.4aCD
T7 270 ± 6.1bD 258 ± 6.9bB 263 ± 6.4b 238 ± 9.7aD
T8 256 ± 0.7aC 256 ± 6.4aB 260 ± 9.9aD 256 ± 14.9aE
T9 235 ± 3.4bA 237 ± 10.7bA 234 ± 0.0bA 223 ± 14.1aB
T10 244 ± 9.2cAB 235 ± 13.2bA 234 ± 13.4bA 223 ± 7.8aB

asee Table 1

All the given values are means of three determinations ± standard deviation

Data are expressed as μmol Trolox equivalent (TE) antioxidant capacity per 100 g fresh date.

Means having different letter in a row (or column) are significantly different (P < 0.05)