Table 1.
Chamber location/monkey | Arm | Fixation (s) | Bicolor target (s) | Single-color target (effector instruction, s) | Planning period (s) | Included in manuscript? | % of data per animal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R | R | 0.8–1.2 | 0.6 | 0.6–1.2 | Yes | 50 | |
R | R | 0.8–1.2 | 0.6 | 0.6–1.2 (saccade) | No | 25 | |
R | R | 0.8–1.2 | 0.6 | 0.6–1.2 (reach) | No | 25 | |
L | R | 1–1.5 | 1 (saccade) | 1–1.5 | Yes | 32 | |
L | R | 1–1.5 | 1 (reach) | 1–1.5 | Yes | 32 | |
L | R | 0.8–1.2 | 0.5 | 0.5–1 | Yes | 18 | |
L | R | 0.8–1.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 (saccade) | 0.5–1 | Yes | 9 |
L | R | 0.8–1.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 (reach) | 0.5–1 | Yes | 9 |
aEach monkey took part in a reach-saccade task with a planning period. Monkey L used the contralateral (right) arm to the recording chamber. Monkey R used the ipsilateral (also right) arm. For Monkey R, some trials without a planning period (rows 2 and 3) were interleaved with conventional planning trials, but these trials were excluded from analysis. Any trials without an instructed effector (5th column) were decision-making trials, in which the animal was free to decide on which effector to use.