Table 3.
Study | N | Interaction | Outcome Measures |
Results | Hedges’s g [95% CI] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Abrams et al., 2001 | 61 | Groups 6 delivered speeches |
VAS, AAS, Positive thoughts inventory |
Decrease anxiety: Increase positive thoughts |
0.45 [−0.08, 0.99] |
| |||||
Babor et al., 1983 | 16 | Dyads performed competitive tasks |
POMS | Increase elation and friendliness |
0.51 [0.01, 1.01] |
| |||||
Del Porto & Masur, 1984† | 40 | Groups 4 unstructured interaction |
Structured mood interview |
Increase euphoria and emotionality |
0.75 [0.12, 1.38] |
| |||||
De Wit & Doty, 1994 | 27 | Groups 2-4 unstructured interaction |
POMS | Increase elation, friendliness and positive mood |
0.42 [0.04, 0.81] |
| |||||
Doty & De Wit, 1995a† | 41 | Groups 3-4 unstructured interaction |
POMS | Increase elation, positive mood and friendliness. |
0.51 [0.19, 0.83] |
| |||||
Doty & De Wit, 1995b | 13 | Groups 3-4 unstructured interaction |
POMS | Decrease anxiety: Increase friendliness |
0.84 [0.24, 1.44] |
| |||||
Doty et al., 1997 | 25 | Groups 3-4 unstructured interaction |
VAS | Increased lighthearted mood | 0.48 [0.08, 0.89] |
| |||||
Doty et al., 1994 | 19 | Dyads unstructured interaction |
POMS | NS | 0.00 [−0.51, 0.51] |
| |||||
Fairbairn & Sayette, 2013a | 720 | Groups 3 unstructured interaction |
Multi-item mood inventory |
Increase positive mood: Decrease negative mood |
0.59 [0.32, 0.86] |
| |||||
Holdstock & De Wit, 1999 | 27 | Groups 3-4 unstructured interaction |
POMS | Increase friendliness, elation and positive mood |
0.39 [0.01, 0.77] |
| |||||
Kirchner et al., 2006 | 54 | Groups 3 unstructured interaction |
Perceived social bonding |
Increase bonding | 0.54 [−0.06, 1.14] |
| |||||
Kirkpatrick & de Wit, 2013† | 44 | Dyads unstructured interaction |
Multi-item mood inventory |
Decrease dysphoria, increase sociability |
0.54 [0.22, 0.86] |
| |||||
Lindfors & Lindman, 1987 | 16 | Groups 4 watch video then discuss |
Multi-item mood inventory |
Increase positive mood: Decrease negative mood |
0.99 [−0.15, 2.14] |
| |||||
Monahan & Samp, 2007 | 42 | Dyads perform cooperative tasks |
STAI | Decrease anxiety | 0.62 [0.01, 1.23] |
| |||||
Pliner & Cappell, 1974† | 120 | Groups 3 cooperative task |
Multi-item mood inventory |
Increase friendly and elation: Decrease unhappy and bored. |
0.77 [0.20, 1.35] |
| |||||
Sayette et al., 2012a | 720 | Groups 3 unstructured interaction |
Perceived social bonding |
Increase bonding | 0.59 [0.32, 0.86] |
| |||||
Sher, 1985 † | 98 | Groups 3-5 unstructured interaction |
Multi-item mood inventory |
Increase Pleasure. No setting by alcohol interaction. |
0.43 [0.04, 0.83] |
| |||||
Smith et al., 1975a | 36 | Acquainted dyads unstructured interaction |
Multi-item mood inventory |
NS | 0.20 [−0.28, 0.68] |
Study featured factorial design in which subjects were tested both in a social setting and in isolation
Results drawn from same sample of participants
NS = No significant effects; AAS = Audience Anxiousness Scale; STAI = State Trait Anxiety Inventory; POMS = Profile of Mood States; VAS = Visual Analogue (mood) Scale.
In the column headed “results” we aimed to reflect all findings identified as significant by study authors. In our own effect size calculations, we adjust for the effects of nesting and average effects across all outcomes for which sufficient information was provided to inform these calculations.