Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2014 Apr 24;121(8):1547–1557.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.036

Table 3.

Visual Acuity Results in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study

Ahmed Group
N=104
Baerveldt Group
N=101
P-value

Snellen VA, logMAR mean ± SD
  Baseline (n=276) 1.07 ± 1.01 1.04 ± 1.00 .80
  3 years (n=205) 1.16 ± 1.07 1.19 ± 1.28 0.83
  Change at 3 years (n=205) 0.21 ± 0.88 0.26 ± 0.74 .66

Loss of ≥ 2 Snellen lines at 3 years, n (%)* 36 (35%) 30 (30%) 0.55
  Glaucoma 14 (39%) 9 (30%)
  Retinal disease 8 (22%) 5 (17%)
  Cataract 3 (8%) 4 (13%)
  Other 8 (22%) 11 (37%)
  Unknown 4 (11%) 1 (3%)
*

Patients may have more than one reason for decreased vision. In the one year manuscript, a change in acuity from counting fingers (CF) to hand motions (HM) and a change from HM to light perception (LP) was considered a two Snellen line loss. In the current manuscript these are considered a one Snellen line loss.

Two sided Student t-test

Fisher exact test

VA = Visual Acuity, Logmar = Logarithm of the Minium Angle of Resolution visual acuity, SD = Standard Deviation