Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 27;20:1192–1202.

Table 1. DAVID analysis results for significantly up- or down- regulated proteins in pterygium tissues.

Term Count % P-Value Benjamini
Upregulated proteins
structural molecule activity
32
21.9
7.60E-14
2.20E-11
nucleotide binding
32
21.9
3.10E-02
4.00E-01
cytoskeletal protein binding
17
11.6
3.90E-05
1.90E-03
peptidase activity
11
7.5
6.00E-02
5.30E-01
guanyl ribonucleotide binding
10
6.8
1.40E-02
2.40E-01
structural constituent of eye lens
6
4.1
5.00E-07
3.70E-05
glycosaminoglycan binding
6
4.1
1.30E-02
2.50E-01
phosphotransferase activity
3
2.1
4.20E-02
4.50E-01
Downregulated proteins
structural molecule activity
12
17.4
1.60E-04
1.70E-02
peptidase activity
7
10.1
4.30E-02
4.70E-01
identical protein binding
7
10.1
7.90E-02
6.50E-01
carbohydrate binding
6
8.7
2.50E-02
3.70E-01
protein binding, bridging
5
7.2
9.80E-04
6.80E-02
glycosaminoglycan binding
5
7.2
4.20E-03
1.40E-01
polysaccharide binding
5
7.2
5.90E-03
1.70E-01
oxidoreductase activity, acting on peroxide as acceptor
3
4.3
9.80E-03
2.10E-01
antioxidant activity
3
4.3
2.00E-02
3.30E-01
integrin binding
3
4.3
3.10E-02
3.90E-01
growth factor binding 3 4.3 8.70E-02 6.60E-01

The Categories “GO-Molecular Function” were selected for testing. Term, specific terms within DAVID-categories; p value, p values for enrichment calculated by the EASE method used in DAVID; Benjamini, p values corrected for multiple testing by the Benjamini Hochberg method.