Table 5. Relationships among three theoretical leadership models, motivation and outcomes, using empirically surveyed correlations and correlations predicted by semantic values.

Main construct relationships	Scale pairs	Mean observed correlations	Predicted correlations in lin. regression	Correlations predicted in GLM
Leadership to Leadersh.	Consideration → Consideration	.55	.29	.55
	Consideration → Initiate struct.	.23	.32	.23
	Consideration → LMX	.47	.28	.47
	Consideration → Transform. lead.	.47	.29	.47
	Initiate struct. → Initiate struct.	.33	.34	.33
	Initiate struct. → LMX	.27	.29	.27
	Initiate struct.→Transform. lead.	.34	.31	.34
	LMX→LMX	.63	.37	.63
	LMX → Transform. lead.	.47	.27	.47
	Transform. lead. →Transform. lead.	.56	.29	.56
	Mean absolute values	.43	.31	.43
Leadership to Motives	Consideration → Affective comm.	.21	.34	.21
	Initiate struct. → Affective comm.	.13	.35	.13
	LMX- > Affective comm.	.20	.31	.20
	Transform. lead. → Affective comm.	.22	.30	.22
	Consideration → Job sat.	.36	.31	.36
	Initiate struct. → Job sat.	.19	.34	.19
	LMX → Job sat.	.33	.32	.33
	Transform. lead. → Job sat.	.32	.30	.32
	Mean absolute values	.24	.32	.24
Leadership to Outcomes	Consideration → Turnover int.	−.26	−.17	−.26
	Consideration → Work effort	.16	.31	.16
	Consideration → Work quality	.11	.32	.11
	Initiate struct. → Turnover int.	−.13	−.20	−.13
	Initiate struct. → Work effort	.12	.35	.12
	Initiate struct.→ Work quality	.10	.34	.10
	LMX → Turnover int.	−.24	−.17	−.24
	LMX → Work effort	.15	.32	.15
	LMX → Work quality	.14	.31	.14
	Transform. lead. → Turnover int.	−.23	−.16	−.23
	Transform. lead. → Work effort	.17	.30	.17
	Transform. lead.→ Work quality	.14	.32	.14
	Mean absolute values	.16	.27	.16
Motive to Motive	Affective comm. → Affective comm.	.43	.40	.43
	Affective comm. → Job sat.	.40	.34	.40
	Job sat. → Job sat.	.68	.45	.68
	Mean absolute values	.50	.40	.50
Motive to Outcome	Affective comm. → Turnover int.	−.37	−.20	−.37
	Affective comm. → Work effort	.22	.33	.22
	Affective comm. → Work quality	.14	.34	.14
	Job sat. → Turnover int.	−.49	−.22	−.49
	Job sat. → Work effort	.31	.38	.31
	Job sat. → Work quality	.17	.36	.17
	Mean absolute values	.28	.31	.28
Outcome to Outcome	Turnover int. → Turnover int.	.62	.38	.62
	Turnover int. → Work effort	−.15	−.22	−.15
	Turnover int. → Work quality	−.08	−.22	−.08
	Work effort → Work effort	.54	.42	.54
	Work effort → Work quality	.35	.36	.35
	Work quality → Work quality	.48	.41	.48
	Mean absolute values	.37	.33	.37