Table 3. ANOVA analysis of Differences in Relative Abundance at the genus level between sham and H. hepaticus infected FXR KO mice.
OTU | P-value | FDR rate | FXR KO sham Mean Relative Abundance | FXR KO Hh Mean Relative Abundance |
k__Bacteria; p__Bacteroidetes; c__Bacteroidia; o__Bacteroidales; f__[Odoribacteraceae]; g__Odoribacter | 0.0002 | 0.863% | 0.00191 | 0.0089 |
k__Bacteria; p__Cyanobacteria; c__4C0d-2; o__YS2; f__; g__ | 0.0047 | 8.670% | 0.00503 | 0.001286 |
k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Epsilonproteobacteria; o__Campylobacterales; f__Helicobacteraceae; g__Helicobacter | 0.0071 | 8.706% | 0 | 0.003382 |
Significance was defined as P<0.05 & FDR rate <10% by ANOVA due to the reduced number of animals in this subset.