Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 3;9(9):e106764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106764

Table 3. ANOVA analysis of Differences in Relative Abundance at the genus level between sham and H. hepaticus infected FXR KO mice.

OTU P-value FDR rate FXR KO sham Mean Relative Abundance FXR KO Hh Mean Relative Abundance
k__Bacteria; p__Bacteroidetes; c__Bacteroidia; o__Bacteroidales; f__[Odoribacteraceae]; g__Odoribacter 0.0002 0.863% 0.00191 0.0089
k__Bacteria; p__Cyanobacteria; c__4C0d-2; o__YS2; f__; g__ 0.0047 8.670% 0.00503 0.001286
k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Epsilonproteobacteria; o__Campylobacterales; f__Helicobacteraceae; g__Helicobacter 0.0071 8.706% 0 0.003382

Significance was defined as P<0.05 & FDR rate <10% by ANOVA due to the reduced number of animals in this subset.