Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Endoscopy. 2014 Mar 13;46(5):401–410. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365310

Table 3.

Differences of non-physicians performing flexible sigmoidoscopy with respect to outcome measures stratified by procedure indication and study design.

Polyp detection rate
% (95% CI)
Adenoma detection
rate % (95% CI)
Colorectal cancer
detection rate % (95% CI)
Adverse event rate (per
1,000 procedures) (95% CI)
Procedure indication
  Colorectal screening
    Non-physiciana 19.5 (18.5–20.6) 6.7 (6.1–7.4) 0.4 (0.3–0.9) 0.2 (0.04–0.9)
    Mid-level 22.9 (21.5–24.4) 7.2 (6.4–8.2) 0.3 (0.06–0.9) 0 (0–1.0)
    Nurse 14.8 (13.5–16.3) 6.1 (5.2–7.1) 0.4 (0.2–0.7) 0.4 (0.09–2.1)
  Diagnostic
    Non-physician 9.7 (9.1–10.2) 1.6 (1.4–2.0) 1.5 (1.3–1.7) 0.2 (0.05–0.7)
    Mid-level 43.3 (37.4–49.3) --- 3.6 (2.1–5.9) 0 (0–8.9)
    Nurse 8.9 (8.4–9.4) 1.6 (1.4–2.0) 1.4 (1.2–1.7) 0.2 (0.05–0.7)
Study design
  Observational
    Non-physician 12.6 (12.1–13.1) 3.8 (3.5–4.2) 1.3 (1.1–1.5) 0.2 (0.03–0.5)
    Mid-level 24.5 (23.1–25.9) 7.2 (6.4–8.2) 1.3 (0.7–2.0) 0 (0–0.9)
    Nurse 9.4 (8.9–9.9) 2.6 (2.3–2.9) 1.3 (1.1–1.5) 0.2 (0.04–0.6)
  Randomized controlled trial
    Non-physician 19.7 (16.9–22.8) 6.4 (4.8–8.5) 1.0 (0.4–2.0) 1.4 (0.03–7.6)
    Mid-level --- --- --- ---
    Nurse 19.7 (16.9–22.8) 6.4 (4.8–8.5) 1.0 (0.4–2.0) 1.4 (0.03–7.6)
a

Non-physician includes mid-level and nurse providers.