Table 2. Reserved Items Generated from Each NGT Group.
NGT Group | Items | Scorea in finalvote | Scorea inpreliminary vote | No. of votesb inpreliminary vote |
Group 1 | Items = 6 | Range = 6–36 | Range = 0–18 | Range = 0–6 |
(n = 6) | Strange people on streetsc | 25 | 6 | 2 |
HSES/HW | Parks | 24 | 5 | 2 |
Recreation grounds | 24 | 3 | 1 | |
Sufficient lighting | 20 | 3 | 2 | |
Shopping malls with air conditioning | 18 | 3 | 1 | |
Bridge or tunnel | 15 | 3 | 1 | |
Group 2 | Items = 5 | Range = 6–36 | Range = 0–18 | Range = 0–6 |
(n = 6) | Dangerous people on the bridgec | 27 | 10 | 4 |
HSES/HW | Fresh air | 20 | 5 | 2 |
Too much noise* c | 18 | 5 | 3 | |
Subway station | 14 | 3 | 1 | |
Hard to find toilet in shopping mallc | 11 | 3 | 1 | |
Group 3 | Items = 5 | Range = 8–40 | Range = 0–24 | Range = 0–8 |
(n = 8) | Recreation grounds | 31 | 17 | 6 |
HSES/LW | Crime at nightc | 31 | 9 | 4 |
Inconvenient transportationc | 24 | 7 | 3 | |
Too many people in recreation groundsc | 19 | 6 | 5 | |
Fresh air | 15 | 3 | 2 | |
Group 4 | Items = 8 | Range = 6–48 | Range = 0–18 | Range = 0–6 |
(n = 6) | Dangerous people on streetsc | 45 | 7 | 3 |
LSES/HW | Insane people on streetsc | 39 | 4 | 3 |
Addicts on streetsc | 35 | 3 | 1 | |
Strangers in parksc | 30 | 3 | 1 | |
Afraid of being taken or hurt at nightc | 23 | 3 | 1 | |
Recreation grounds | 19 | 3 | 1 | |
Convenient transportation | 16 | 3 | 2 | |
Perfume shop | 9 | 3 | 1 | |
Group 5 | Items = 6 | Range = 8–48 | Range = 0–24 | Range = 0–8 |
(n = 8) | Crimes nearbyc | 41 | 11 | 5 |
LSES/LW | Strange people on streetsc | 36 | 6 | 2 |
Public order is good | 27 | 5 | 2 | |
Interesting animals | 24 | 5 | 2 | |
Fewer cars on roads | 21 | 3 | 1 | |
Fresh air | 19 | 4 | 2 |
Score of an item in two voting processes was calculated by summing up the individual score across all participants in a NGT group. It indicated the relative importance of an item within a NGT group. In the preliminary vote process, as an item would receive a score ranging from 0 (not chosen as a priority) to 3 (chosen as the first priority) from each participant, the theoretical range of score would be from (0*number of participants in a NGT group) to (3*number of participants in a NGT group); in the final vote process, as an item would receive a score ranging from 1 to as high as number of reserved items in a NGT group, the theoretical range of score would be from (1* number of participants in a NGT group) to (number of reserved items in a NGT group * number of participants in the same NGT group).
Votes refer to number of times an item was selected as a priority by participants during the preliminary vote, regardless of the score assigned to it. The theoretical range of votes would be from 0 to number of participants in a NGT group.
Factors perceived to decrease the participants’ willingness to do PA.