Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jun 16;23(9):1863–1872. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0102

Table 2.

Adjusted ORs (95% CIs)a for glioma and meningioma in relation to categorical indicators of occupational ELF-MF exposure overall (1-year lag), INTEROCC study, 2000–2004, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, and United Kingdom

Exposure Metric Glioma Meningioma
Cases Controls OR (95% CI)a Cases Controls OR 95% CIa
Cumulative Exposure (μT-years)
< 2.11 475 1,334 1.00 (ref) 473 1,265 1.00 (ref)
2.11–< 3.40 454 1,327 1.00 (0.85, 1.18) 465 1,278 0.96 (0.82, 1.13)
3.40–< 5.00 441 1,344 0.93 (0.78, 1.11) 414 1,295 0.84 (0.70, 0.99)
5.00–<7.50 370 808 1.07 (0.88, 1.31) 290 783 1.05 (0.86, 1.29)
7.50+ 199 540 0.80 (0.63, 1.00) 180 524 0.89 (0.70, 1.12)
p-value trend 0.08 0.51
Average Exposure (μT)
< 0.11 423 1,268 1.00 (ref) 426 1,224 1.00 (ref)
0.11–< 0.13 398 1,273 0.96 (0.82, 1.13) 419 1,244 0.94 (0.79, 1.10)
0.13–<0.17 551 1,411 1.04 (0.89, 1.22) 510 1,345 1.18 (1.00, 1.38)
0.17–<0.24 330 856 0.95 (0.80, 1.14) 262 809 1.03 (0.85, 1.25)
0.24+ 237 545 1.00 (0.82, 1.23) 205 523 1.08 (0.87, 1.33)
p-value trend 0.99 0·41
Maximum Exposed Job (μT)
< 0.13 453 1,370 1.00 (ref) 505 1,341 1.00 (ref)
0.13–< 0.17 458 1,290 0.92 (0.79, 1.08) 439 1,247 1.03 (0.88, 1.20)
0.17–< 0.23 430 1,202 0.85 (0.73, 1.00) 362 1,146 0.98 (0.83, 1.16)
0.23–<0.62 382 947 0.92 (0.78, 1.09) 286 891 1.01 (0.84, 1.21)
0.62+ 216 544 0.80 (0.65, 0.98) 230 520 1.15 (0.94, 1.42)
p-value trend 0.08 0·16
Exposure Duration (years)
< 5 1,333 3,849 1.00 (ref) 1,324 3,716 1.00 (ref)
5–< 15 295 805 0.90 (0.77, 1.05) 255 754 0.99 (0.84, 1.17)
15–< 25 142 371 0.94 (0.76, 1.16) 104 353 0.85 (0.67, 1.08)
25+ 169 328 1.22 (0.99, 1.51) 139 322 1.30 (1.03, 1.64)
p-value trend 0.26 0.20
a

OR estimated using conditional logistic regression models stratified by country, region, sex, and 5-year age group at the reference date and adjusted for level of educational attainment. Cut points based on the 25th, 50th, 75th, and, 90th percentile of the control exposure distribution. Tests for linear trend used Wald x2 tests, with categorical medians modeled as ordinal variables.