Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 27;15(1):290. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-290

Table 1.

Comparison among different LIMS systems

LIMS software MendeLIMS GNomEx Galaxy LIMS QTREDS
Clinical study patient samples
Patient data (gender/race, MRN, pathology, histology) Yes No No No
Sample processing (dissections, extractions) Yes No No Yesa
Sample location tracking Yes No No Yes
Arrays, libraries, sequencing runs
Molecular assays (genomic arrays, ddPCR, ..) Yes Yes No Yes
Sequencing library prep (singleplex and multiplex) Yes Yes Yes Yesb
Flow cell/sequencing run setup Yes Yes Yes No
Post-sequencing analysis
Sequencing QC Yes nd Yesc No
Analysis workflow No Yes Yesc No
Security/Audit trail
Authorization via user roles Yes Yes Yes Yes
Audit trail Yes Yes nd nd
HTTPS/SSL security Yes nd nd Yes
General
Email/notification capability Yes Yes Yesc Yes
Customizable lists for data validation Yes Yes Yes Yes
Instrument integration No No Yesd No
Attach files to samples/libraries/sequencing runs Yes nd No nd
Visualization of results No Yese Yesc No
Other
Project based billing No Yes No No
Reagent inventory management No No No Yes
Publicly available User Guide/Demos Yes Yes No Yes

a)Detailed information tracked regarding sample prep; b)Singleplex libraries only; c)Functionality provided via integration with Galaxy and genome browsers; d)Integration with HiSeq 2000 only; e)Functionality provided via integration with GenoPub.

nd - Indicates that unable to determine from public documentation whether the functionality is provided.